![]() ![]() It's never going to work on ARM or RISC V or anything else. As far as I can tell ReactOS is written in x86 assembler. Heater wrote:ReactOS is brilliant and all but it's not going anywhere. Make sure to include a way to make keeping ReactOS up to date on these installations simple. How ever little, get things closer to being able to do something about the situation, get ReactOS to be able to stably and reliably run the applications that are needed, so that ReactOS can be recommended as a replacement to the Windows NT installations that are currently having difficulty being kept up. This because ReactOS is a Windows NT clone that is open source. ReactOS is the first open source solution that stands a chance of truly being capable of replacing many Windows installations, once it becomes complete enough (which it really is getting close now). Windows is one of the most used desktop/server/laptop operating systems, especially in commercial settings. These things said, I would keep an eye on ReactOS. Yes had MS stuck to OS/2 there is a large probability we would have something better today. Yes Windows is the most used system in many applications. Yes keeping up to date is extremely important for any system. Yes there are well known holes in just about every system. Yes there are differences in the level and regiment of security across OS sources. Yes more Windows PC's are attacked than Linux PC's. For 16 years I chased viruses as part of a living, I'm glad to be retired from that. Convenient and a big selling point but safe? Mostly not. You can examine and update your system through a web browser? That's pretty scary. Too often they sacrifice security for convenience and profit. Microsoft sticks security band-aids over their holes as they're found but inside it's still a single-user operating system. One of the strengths of Unix in general is that it's been around for decades and has been hacked by hundreds of college students, which in the end made it stronger and more secure. They have different packages for different industries. It was worthwhile, it's an impressive system. It took a few years and had many snags, I don't know how many million $ were spent. I worked for a large state university in the US which replaced a literally pre-Windows in-house system on IBM mainframes with Peoplesoft. They control rights to fields in tables or options in interfaces. There's a highly evolved system of permissions that are usually assigned on a need-to-know basis. They have a web front end to just about everything which of course every one can log into and use. Their databases are mostly Oracle which I think is also available under Linux. They're comfortable in a multi-platform environment. They're flexible in that they do customizations and send out consultants to help you convert over. Nothing repels more from desire to do something for this project than gnu/idiots with their stinky repetitive tales.Have you looked into Peoplesoft? They have at least hospital management software, with patient records, HR, purchasing, I'm fairly sure. but he writes walls of gnu/insanity, has to be your role model. leave your applauses for Erik, forgot the surname, that dude, that babbles much but whose works are rejected again and again. you know, bang your linux console or ugly GUI, that's for those freed. there are "so many bugs" over there and they increase in number. bug free from da begin, security full before it was born" and, of course, forget about "windows style" (read the usability, comfort of using, feature set, aesthetics and millions of other things). Wear a tin foil, kiss Torvalds portrait and use that crap they throw at you because you know, for you - it's exactly what is needed and what you deserve - "teh most securitest os in teh world. It is as much irrelevant as it's even not worth of replying to, except pointing you at the stupidity you have been formulataing your senteces with. your set of statements is a stupid parroting copied from MS haters' and linux zealots' psychopathic resources. ![]() In reality NT acrhitecture has much more security than any unix clone. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |